calvert wrote:When Pavarotti is at his best (as he was for that Puritani broadcast in 1976), his singing is, to my ears, filled with light and shade and not monochromatic or monotonous at all. Acdtually, I find Bjoerling's timbre more unvarying than Pavarotti's, but the sound is so stupendous and so sheerly gorgeous, and the musical imagination behind it so potent, that I never find him boring.
But yes, Pavarotti's pp's were often (not always) a kind of faked, breathy crooning; not the best feature of his voice and one that got worse as the years went on. Still, he could do some loverly mezza-voce singing.
I generally had bad luck with Pavarotti in performance (I heard him a lot at the Met); he usually cracked, or came close to cracking, on at least one high note every time I heard him; the Puritani performance was a glorious exception. Actually, at the second performance I saw of Puritani later in that run, Pav was cracking all over the place. On the unison high D with Sutherland in "Vieni, fra queste braccia," Pav's high note turned into a ghastly croak, and he immediatly put his head behind Sutherland's big red bouffant hairdo and let her carry the sound. It was really funny. But then, he nailed the high D a few minutes later in "Credeasi misera."
manh1948 wrote:Calvert
Like you, I saw Pav. many times as my return to the US and subsequent opera going was during his heydays. I think his Puritani with Sills in Phila. is among the greatest and most exciting singing of any tenor ever.
Lauritz wrote:manh1948 wrote:Calvert
Like you, I saw Pav. many times as my return to the US and subsequent opera going was during his heydays. I think his Puritani with Sills in Phila. is among the greatest and most exciting singing of any tenor ever.
I agree about that Puritani with Sills. I have it on CD and he is at his greatest. Not that she was bad either.
kashania wrote:Lauritz wrote:manh1948 wrote:Calvert
Like you, I saw Pav. many times as my return to the US and subsequent opera going was during his heydays. I think his Puritani with Sills in Phila. is among the greatest and most exciting singing of any tenor ever.
I agree about that Puritani with Sills. I have it on CD and he is at his greatest. Not that she was bad either.
I third that notion! He is simply glorious in that live performance.
manh1948 wrote:Pavarotti Philadelphia Puritani Paragon Performance![]()
I have only a pirated tape of that performance. Is the CD a broadcast or an official in-house recording?
manh1948 wrote:Pavarotti Philadelphia Puritani Paragon Performance![]()
I have only a pirated tape of that performance. Is the CD a broadcast or an official in-house recording?
amneris wrote:Pavvarrotti
I am listening to him as I write. I find his voice, its gorgeous but unchanging timbre grating after a few minutes of listening. It becomes boring to me. Can a voice be too even? P's voice sounds very much the same at different levels of pressure and all along its range, except when he does one of his phony ppps.
I prefer a voice like Jussi's that has a baritonaL bottom, a rich middle and ringing tops with many variations of timbre in all ranges.
kashania wrote:Amni: Very interesting interview with Simionato. I didn't realise that she and Callas were so close.
mogliettina wrote:"The story about the poisoning is very weird."
Uh ... VERY!
amneris wrote:The story about the poisoning is very weird.